Medio ambiente

The Red Centre’s expensive new hobby: Becoming an inland sea

We’ve been told the floods are 'once-in-a-century' anomalies. Yet here we are, watching the Stuart Highway crumble like a wet biscuit for the third time in five years. Why is our national supply chain held together by hope and bitumen?

LV
Laura VerdePeriodista
23 de febrero de 2026, 08:053 min de lectura
The Red Centre’s expensive new hobby: Becoming an inland sea

If I had a dollar for every time a politician called a flood in Central Australia a "once-in-a-hundred-year event," I could probably fund the road upgrades they keep promising but never quite deliver. It is February 2026, and while the Stuart Highway is technically open today, the bitumen is still drying from the latest bout of historic rainfall that turned the Red Centre into a beige ocean.

Let’s drop the act. This isn't an anomaly anymore. It’s a feature.

For a nation that prides itself on rugged resilience, our logistical underbelly is terrifyingly soft. We rely on a single arterial strip of asphalt to feed the Northern Territory and huge chunks of Western Australia. When that strip goes under—as it did in 2022, and again recently—the shelves at Coles and Woolworths go bare faster than you can say "supply chain resilience."

"You sit at Port Augusta for three days, watching your load spoil, while Canberra announces another committee to look into 'flood mitigation'. We don't need a committee, mate. We need a bridge." — Dave ‘Macca’ Mackenzie, Road Train Operator.

The numbers don't lie, even if the press releases do. The Federal Treasury estimated that natural disasters in the first half of 2025 alone cost the economy over $2.2 billion. A significant chunk of that comes from paralyzed freight routes. Yet, the government’s flagship solution—the Targeted Investment to Improve National Supply Chain Resilience—threw a paltry $75 million at the problem.

That is not a solution; that is tip money.

The Math That Doesn't Math

We need to talk about the return on investment (or lack thereof). We are hemorrhaging billions in lost productivity, inflated fresh food prices, and emergency airlift costs every time the sky opens up. Meanwhile, we are spending millions patching up a road that sits at ground level in a flood plain.

ItemCost (AUD)
Economic Hit (H1 2025 Disasters)$2,200,000,000
Stuart Highway Flood Repairs (Glendambo)$13,000,000
Total 'Resilience' Fund (2025-26)$75,000,000

Do you see the disparity? We are losing billions to save millions. The definition of insanity is paving the same stretch of road at the same height and expecting the water to route around it.

The Empty Shelf Index

The real victims aren't the trucking companies (though they bleed cash); it’s the families in Alice Springs and Darwin paying $12 for a lettuce because it had to be flown in. Inflation is already a beast; adding a "logistics tax" because we refuse to build floodways is purely self-inflicted.

So, what actually changes? Unless we see a shift from "recovery" spending to "prevention" spending (think massive culverts, elevated causeways, maybe even a second rail line), we are destined to repeat this cycle. The next La Niña isn't a possibility; it’s a calendar appointment.

Until then, stock up on canned beans. The road is open... for now.

LV
Laura VerdePeriodista

Periodista especializado en Medio ambiente. Apasionado por el análisis de las tendencias actuales.